Antibody validation is a topic that has garnered a great deal of attention lately in discussions of the problem with the lack of reproducibility in science.  One type of antibody validation that should be avoided uses purified recombinant proteins.  In a typical study of this type a purified recombinant protein is run on a western blot and then the labeling of the new antibody is examined.  Given that only a single protein is run on the blot, this “validation” study offers very little information about the specificity or sensitivity of the antibody.  The blot obviously has no information about whether the antibody recognizes other proteins since no other protein is present in the blot.  Moreover, absent any information about the relevance of the amount of recombinant protein used compared to the amount of endogenous protein in situ, the experiment does not even validate the ability of the antibody to bind to the protein of interest. 
Thus a western blot with recombinant protein does little to answer the two key questions about antibody quality: 1. ) Does the antibody possess the sensitivity to recognize the antigen in situ in a tissue of interest? and 2. ) Is the antibody binding specific for the antigen of interest in situ?  Nevertheless it is not unusual to see such data used to validate an antibody in product data sheets or even in refereed publications. So it is important to look carefully at any antibody validation blots to be sure that a cell lysate and not simply a purified protein is being analyzed.
In the example above I described a situation in which a recombinant protein based assay was used to give a false positive validation.  It is also not uncommon to see a recombinant protein based assay provide a false negative result i.e. to falsely invalidate an antibody.  Such experiments are most commonly seen with phosphospecific antibodies.  Such antibodies can be extremely valuable tools as they permit one to evaluate the phosphorylation state of a single phosphorylation site on a specific protein.  A critical question in the validation of such antibodies is whether they are indeed phosphospecific.  A mutant recombinant protein with the phosphorylation site of interest mutated to a non-phosphorylatable amino acid is run along side the recombinant protein in a western blot.  The antibody of interest is then tested for binding to this assay.  Binding to the non-phosphorylatable mutant in such an assay has been used by some as evidence that the antibody’s phosphospecificity has been invalidated.  Such data do not provide such evidence.  A phospho-specific antibody will always have at least a finite affinity for the non phospho-site.  Thus when, as is typical in such studies, micrograms or hundreds of nanograms of the mutant protein are run on the blot, some binding is highly likely.  In order to use such an assay for validation it is necessary to do a very detailed dose response with multiple concentrations of both the mutant non-phospho and the phosphoprotein.  Attention must also be paid to the concentration of the protein of interest in situ and also its level of phosphorylation at the site of interest.  Determining these values is always quite problematic.  Consequently the use of such a validation technique in not recommended particularly when other much more relevant validation assays are available.  The most common such assay is the western blot performed on lysates of the tissue of interest that had been incubated in the absence or presence of a phosphatase.  In such an assay the antibody is validated if it labels a single band in the control lysate and if the labeling is absent in the lysate that had been incubated in the presence of the phosphatase. 
One issue raised in the preceding paragraph was the fact that there is always a finite affinity of a phosphospecific antibody to the non-phosphoprotein.  Such binding of the phospho-antibody to the non-phosphosite can be quite problematic in negative affinity column selection of the phospho-antibody.  In our experience we have often found that very good phosphospecific antibodies may sometime fail to flow through a non-phospho column.  To avoid failures in such negative selection experiments it is very important to optimize the antibody to peptide ratio in using such a column.   This issue will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent blog.

Why Recombinant Proteins Make Poor Antibody Validation Tools
Article Name
Why Recombinant Proteins Make Poor Antibody Validation Tools
Recombinant proteins are often used to validate antibodies, but this type of validation does not address whether the antibody in question is specific for or sensitive enough to detect the protein of interest in endogenous tissue.
Mike Browning
Publisher Name
Publisher Logo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.